Posted by: David Wall on: February 24, 2011
There is a world that teaches people they are not valuable as they are, unless they become something other than who they are. Although, they can't appear they want to be other than who they are, as this makes them look weak and they need to look strong so others won't de-value them even further. The way they deal with this situation is by pretending to be happy, while being secretly unhappy because they can’t find a way to be anything other than who they are.
As time passes the belief that who they are is no good becomes so persistent that it is almost indistinguishable from who they are, almost.
The result is they become stuck in a perpetual and secret unhappiness. This unhappiness makes them dismiss or even worse destroy the things or the people that make them happy, aggravating the immediate problem for themselves and everyone else even further.
They keep this up throughout their lives and unknowingly pass the pretence on to their children making the cycle continue indefinitely. All the while, because they are so afraid others will see them for who they truly are, they fail to stand up and say:
“I am not afraid”
Are you afraid?
Posted by: David Wall on: June 16, 2010
Posted via email from Pixelalchemy holistic web page marketing
Posted by: David Wall on: June 2, 2010
Posted via email from Pixelalchemy holistic web page marketing
Posted by: David Wall on: June 2, 2010
Posted via email from Pixelalchemy holistic web page marketing
Posted by: David Wall on: January 31, 2010
There's bound to be controversy when you start talking about core features of anything, especially something like advertising and marketing – but say we invite a little discussion (and controversy) and state the obvious that essentially we're trying to address a communication problem. The problem is simple – you the so and so of the whatever company needs to communicate that your product has value enough for someone to take notice and relinquish some hard-earned cash. A few ideas get thrown around and added to a document titled [fill in the blanks] strategy or [fill in the blanks] campaign etc. Essentially, we're still attempting to solve a communication problem. So, what's this communication thing? Because we're reducing things left right and center, why not do it even further by saying communication is all about gaining a mutual understanding? If we don't understand each other, communication gets really tricky. And how does understanding come about? Strip it down once more and lets say that at the very least when you can connect to some type of shared experience/s, understanding will follow. At that point the billion dollar question is how does a brand connect with people's shared experiences? Your product at some point must have come about to "fill a gap in the market". This is essentially saying, there is a human need that is not being met or there's a human problem that's not being solved and that's why the product is there. So whatever it is you sell somehow solves people's problems and meets a human need. This is not necessarily a material need – there's markets for emotional needs, economic needs, intellectual needs etc. So the shared experience involves the conditions that brought about the need for your product to exist in the first place. Some companies go beyond marketing and branding and ask the question: why? Why does the company exist? What is it's contribution? etc. These questions are not esoteric but are at the core of knowing how brands can make a real connection and find social authenticity. When your brand does that it becomes a cultural resource. It's economic strength is secondary to it's purpose, its contribution – but important to keep the possibility of it's exchange, as a valuable resource alive. To put it simply: when your product is not about money, people throw money at it.
Posted via email from Pixelalchemy holistic web page marketing
Posted by: David Wall on: January 13, 2010
Misiu the dog is not interested in all the benefits of eating any type of dog food. In fact, he prefers non-packaged food such as chicken scraps thrown on street gutters. The photo seen here shows Misiu on the hunt for gutter chicken.
Posted by: David Wall on: January 8, 2010
What is he thinking? A silhouette of a woman, cars popping up, the few confident looking people in focus behind the majority faded others – this is about how our incessant and needy thoughts function. They're the ongoing background thoughts that seek to find resolution, a feeling of completion or peace by getting the things we desire – the recognition (or love) of another (woman image) or material things (car images). The few in the forefront are the mythical end point – they're the Superclass, those who have all the material desires and recognition at their disposal. The problem is it's based on a big myth – there's always another car, a bigger yaught, a more prestigious mansion and always someone who still doesn't give us the recognition we believe we deserve. There can be no end point to this because this story only survives if we never find completion. But we're sold anyway by the temporary high we get every time we buy into this with our belief and our hard earned cash – the misplaced idea we're getting closer is like an addictive hunger, never satisfied and always begging for more. So what's Lawrence's Year of the Tiger secret? Lawrence points to how in 2010 this story is most powerfully sold by immersive / interactive experiences found in new media (usually a combination of images, footage, music / voice). These tools are often used to perpetuate the story as they offer an quick outlet to our "unfulfilled" reality and we are compelled to drop our guard or suspend our disbelief to immerse ourselves in this "better" prescribed reality. While this happens we become less conscious of our own reality and more susceptible to unconscious influences of this new reality often with direct agendas in mind. The good news is Lawrence sees another force surfacing in 2010 – the conscious consumer. The conscious consumer seeks real information on products and services and being more conscious and self-aware, this consumer is not as vulnerable. The world map indicates the world wide web (internet) – This is where the conscious consumer seeks authentic information published by people without direct agenda or affiliation on anything he or she is compelled to buy or become involved in. As the internet is filled with information from every angle, the conscious consumer learns how to discern and spot a fake (information with affiliation) very quickly. The 1+1=2, is an equation that shows why this story is so unreliable. It basically states that you are not complete right now (1) until you fulfill certain requirements or obtain certain things. The you of this mythical future (the other 1) is the completed you, the one at peace, the one not lacking. This means the incomplete you and the complete you are two separate entities. This simple equation shows the absurdity of that statement – there are not two of you, only the one – so in truth you are complete right at this very moment. You don't need to do or get anything to complete you. Lawrence says "I suppose I should wish you a happy new year" because not all people are ready to he really happy (or fully conscious) and only those who understand Lawrence's thoughts will have a Happy New Year and be able to receive the Year of the Tiger love and luck. If you know someone who is ready to be happy and lucky throughout the Year of the Tiger – let them know about this. The Law of Reciprocity will undoubtedly spread the the happiness and luck back to you in this auspicious year.
Posted via email from Pixelalchemy holistic web page marketing
Posted by: David Wall on: December 13, 2009
What's the exercise here? To write a short email with one purpose in mind: to introduce people to have conversations about subjects that just keep cropping up in this blog, rather slipping consistently through the cracks… (I gave myself 10 minutes)
Posted via email from Pixelalchemy holistic web page marketing
Posted by: David Wall on: December 10, 2009
I don't think they do. Perhaps the more sense they make, the less potential disruption to what's expected occurs – rendering them less noticeable? I'm not actually that moved by the whole disruption strategy of traditional advertising but a disruption to normality – that's artistic. And lets face it advertising has always been tailing art (just to be controversial).
Posted via email from Pixelalchemy holistic web page marketing